Daily Devotional

Daily Devotional

June 13

A First Book of Daily Readings

by D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones (selected by Frank Cumbers)
Sourced from the OPC website

This means you!

The trouble with this type of unhappy Christian is that he does not really believe the Scriptures. You say: “My trouble is that terrible sin which I have committed.” Let me tell you in the Name of God that that is not your trouble. Your trouble is unbelief. You do not believe the Word of God. I am referring to the First Epistle of John and the first chapter where we read this: “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” That is a categorical statement…. There is no limit to it….

Whatever your sin—it is as wide as that—it does not matter what it is, it does not matter what it was, “if we confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” So if you do not believe that word, and if you go on dwelling on your sin, I say that you are not accepting the Word of God, you are not taking God at His word, you do not believe what He tells you and that is your real sin…. “What God hath cleansed, that call thou not common” (Acts 10:15)…. That is precisely what I would say at this moment to anybody who may have been held in depression by the devil for a number of years over some particular sin…. I do not care what it is… “The blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanseth us from all sin” and all unrighteousness. Believe the Word of God, my friend…. Believe God’s Word. Do not ask Him for a message of forgiveness. He has given it to you. Your prayer may well be an expression of unbelief at that point.

Believe Him and His Word.
Spiritual Depression, pp. 72-3


“Text reproduced from ‘A First Book of Daily Readings’ by Martyn Lloyd-Jones, published by Epworth Press 1970 & 1977 © Trustees for Methodist Church Purposes. Used with permission.”

Daily Devotional

Daily Devotional

April 30

A First Book of Daily Readings

by D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones (selected by Frank Cumbers)
Sourced from the OPC Website

The spirit of forgiveness

… The proof that you and I are forgiven is that we forgive others. If we think that our sins are forgiven by God and we refuse to forgive somebody else, we are making a mistake; we have never been forgiven. The man who knows he has been forgiven, only in and through the shed blood of Christ, is a man who must forgive others. He cannot help himself.

If we really know Christ as our Savior, our hearts are broken and cannot be hard; and we cannot refuse forgiveness. If you are refusing forgiveness to anybody, I suggest that you have never been forgiven; … whenever I see myself before God and realize even something of what my blessed Lord has done for me, I am ready to forgive anybody anything. I cannot withhold it; I do not even want to withhold it….

Pray to God and say, “Forgive me, O God, as I forgive others because of what Thou hast done for me. All I ask is that Thou shouldst forgive me in the same manner, not to the same degree because all I do is imperfect. In the same way, as it were, as Thou hast forgiven me, I am forgiving others. Forgive me as I forgive them because of what the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ has done in my heart.”

This petition is full of the atonement; it is full of the grace of God. We see how important it is by the fact that our Lord actually repeats it … (in [Matthew 6] verses 14 and 15): “…if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” The thing is absolute and inevitable.

True forgiveness breaks a man, and he must forgive. So that when we offer this prayer for forgiveness, we test our­selves in that way. Our prayer is not genuine, it is not true, it is of no avail unless we find there is forgiveness in our heart. God give us grace to be honest with ourselves.
Studies in the Sermon on the Mount, ii, pp. 75-6


“Text reproduced from ‘A First Book of Daily Readings’ by Martyn Lloyd-Jones, published by Epworth Press 1970 & 1977 © Trustees for Methodist Church Purposes. Used with permission.”

Saruman Rejoins the White Council–or Not

Not So Fast

Yesterday, we published a piece about World Vision’s announcement that it was going to turn a blind eye to homosexual practice, becoming agnostic as to its ethics.  Now, the reaction . . .   

World Vision USA Reverses Its Decision

Justin Taylor 
Mar  26  2014

World Magazine broke the news earlier this afternoon that the U.S. board of World Vision released a statement reversing their decision to allow Christian employees to engage in homosexual intercourse as long as they are in a legally recognized same-sex marriage. The letter reads as follows:

Dear Friends,
Today, the World Vision U.S. board publicly reversed its recent decision to change our employment conduct policy. The board acknowledged they made a mistake and chose to revert to our longstanding conduct policy requiring sexual abstinence for all single employees and faithfulness within the Biblical covenant of marriage between a man and a woman.

We are writing to you our trusted partners and Christian leaders who have come to us in the spirit of Matthew 18 to express your concern in love and conviction. You share our desire to come together in the Body of Christ around our mission to serve the poorest of the poor. We have listened to you and want to say thank you and to humbly ask for your forgiveness.

In our board’s effort to unite around the church’s shared mission to serve the poor in the name of Christ, we failed to be consistent with World Vision U.S.’s commitment to the traditional understanding of Biblical marriage and our own Statement of Faith, which says, “We believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God.” And we also failed to seek enough counsel from our own Christian partners. As a result, we made a change to our conduct policy that was not consistent with our Statement of Faith and our commitment to the sanctity of marriage.

We are brokenhearted over the pain and confusion we have caused many of our friends, who saw this decision as a reversal of our strong commitment to Biblical authority. We ask that you understand that this was never the board’s intent. We are asking for your continued support. We commit to you that we will continue to listen to the wise counsel of Christian brothers and sisters, and we will reach out to key partners in the weeks ahead.

While World Vision U.S. stands firmly on the biblical view of marriage, we strongly affirm that all people, regardless of their sexual orientation, are created by God and are to be loved and treated with dignity and respect.

Please know that World Vision continues to serve all people in our ministry around the world. We pray that you will continue to join with us in our mission to be “an international partnership of Christians whose mission is to follow our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in working with the poor and oppressed to promote human transformation, seek justice, and bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God.

Sincerely in Christ,

Richard Stearns, President
Jim Beré, Chairman of the World Vision U.S. Board

A number of Christian leaders have hit the “OK.  It’s all forgiven and forgotten” button.  That response has a lot of weight behind it.  Visions of tax collectors and pharisees in the temple spring to mind.  But  Douglas Wilson says, “Hold on.  Let’s think this through.”

Whirled Vision

My brief post on the reversal of the turnaround at World Vision generated some questions and comments, so let me chase them here.

Start with the central thing — and that would concern our duty of not being the older brother in the parable of the prodigal son. If the subject is sin and repentance, it should go without saying that we should never sneer at a broken and a contrite heart. How many times do we forgive someone? Jesus dealt with this famously when He said the right number was 70 times 7. And that does not mean that once the sinner gets past 490, then pow, right in the kisser. Our forgiveness for others should imitate God’s forgiveness of us, and it is obviously impossible to outshine Him.

Jesus taught that someone could sin against us seven times in a day, and that upon a profession of repentance we should forgive him each time. Now, along about the fourth or fifth incident, I might begin to suspect that my friend is not dealing with the root issues — but I am still to forgive (Luke 17:4).

So, how does this relate, if at all, to World Vision? Our problem is that we have confused two categories that must never be confused. In the church, we must learn to maintain an understanding of a fundamental difference between qualifications for fellowship (on profession of repentance) and qualifications for leadership (as found, for example, in 1 Tim. 3 and Titus 1). The former is not based on the record at all — the publican in the Temple professed himself wretched, and went home justified. But the latter is very much based on proven character over time.

If you require that every member of the church meet the qualifications for elder, then congratulations, you’re a Pharisee. But if you think that elders don’t have to meet the qualifications for elder, then congratulations, you’re a anarchist.

If a pastor committed adultery, can he be forgiven? Of course. Can he be restored to the fellowship of the saints, admitted to communion again? Again, of course. Could this happen in a very short period of time? Of course. Could he preach the sermon three weeks later? Of course not. But the fact is that we live in muddled times, and to refuse him the privilege of the pulpit would be seen by many as a “refusal to forgive.” But it is nothing of the kind. Apples and mangoes.

World Vision is a parachurch diaconal ministry. This means that the qualifications for leadership apply, and not just the qualifications for fellowship. And this means that the leaders of World Vision cannot just announce one day that a practice that God declared to be an abomination is now all right with them, and then two days later (after their financial support started to evaporate) drop that position like a hot rock, and yet remain qualified to provide moral leadership. They blew a huge hole in their credibility. Leadership being what it is, they can receive full and free forgiveness — but the hole is still there. The hole is still there because God wants it still there.

They destroyed their credibility, not me. The first step in restoring that credibility is to receive forgiveness. The second is behave in a way that shows that they understand that destroying their own credibility is what they did. The third is to recognize that credibility is something that is built over time, in the very nature of the case. They can’t just “have it back.” The next thing they should do is start accepting resignations. They sinned in a number of different ways, but one of the big ones is that they demonstrated that they were and are untrustworthy.

One of the most important truths I try to communicate in pastoral counseling is the idea that trust and forgiveness are two very different things. Many people cannot see their way to forgive someone else because they assume that forgiveness requires trust, and they are in a situation where trust would obviously be insane. Forgiveness is required of us because it has been sought, and we give it by grace. It is grace. But trust is earned.

So, do we forgive the leadership of World Vision for this sin that they have confessed? Absolutely. Do we trust them? Are you serious?

Hopeless Confusions

Modest Propositions

Here is a modest, straightforward, orthodox Christian syllogism:

The risen Lord Jesus Christ delivers people from their sins
Homosexuality in all its forms is sinful
Therefore, the Lord delivers homosexuals from their from their homosexuality.  

There is little that can be controversial about such a syllogism, unless one wishes to make the Incarnation or the Resurrection controversial.  True, some who profess Christianity may demur or disagree.  There may be some discussion on whether the Bible teaches homosexuality is a sin–but so often such discussions rapidly fall into deeper, broader matters such as the authority and inspiration of the Bible itself, or the Deity of our Lord. But for those who receive the Bible as the very word of God and who believe in its plenary divine inspiration there can be no controversy here. 

Why, then, is the following matter regarded as so controversial?
 

In the radio interview, which followed his initial claims about the link between flooding and gay marriage in a letter to the Henley Standard, [UKIP councillor] Silvester said: “I don’t have a problem with gay people. “I believe as a Christian I should love gay people and indeed, I do.  “My prayer for them is they will be healed. It is nonsense to say it is homophobic. If you love a person enough to want them to be healed and to have a proper family, that is hardly homophobic. It is a spiritual disease … it’s not what I say, it’s what the Bible says.” (The Guardian)

Silvester has been suspended from the party for these views. UKIP has a “gay and lesbian group” who wrote Silvester an open letter claiming he had “rightly attracted derision from people of all political beliefs, and once again painted Ukip in a negative light – an unacceptable act for which you cannot be excused”. 

Now, we, for our part, would hasten to excuse that same group for their profound ignorance of Christian teaching.  Since they clearly have little knowledge of the Scriptures, they can hardly be held accountable for such fundamental theological and logical errors as confusing primary with secondary causes–as is evident for their additional criticism of Silvester (who had the temerity to link the recent floods in Great Britain with divine judgment):

The open letter from Ukip’s LGBT group said: “The Met Office have stated ‘the main reason for the mild and wet weather so far is that we have seen a predominance of west and south-west winds, bringing in mild air from the Atlantic – as well as generally unsettled conditions’ – regardless of whether you believe in a God or not, sudden rainfall has not just formulated out of nowhere upon the UK. An Act of God this is not.”

Such folk can be excused, yes.  But not taken seriously.  

Meanwhile, since homosexuals and (it appears) the majority of the public want to excuse homosexuals for their homosexuality, we wonder what else they wish to excuse in their generosity and tolerance.

Here is a clear, unequivocal statement from Scripture about homosexuality and its sinfulness:

For this reason God game them up to dishonorable passions.  For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.  (Romans 1: 26,27)

Then come the following litany:

And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.  They were filled with all manner of:
unrighteousness
evil
covetousness
malice.
They are full of envy
murder,
strife,
deceit,
maliciousness.
They are gossips,
slanderers,
haters of God,
insolent,
haughty,
boastful,
inventors of evil,
disobedient to parents,
foolish,
faithless,
heartless,
ruthless.
Though they know God’s decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them. (Romans 1: 28-32)

One is left wondering by what standard homosexuality can be excised from this passage, whilst the indictment of other sins is left intact?   Or, is one left thinking that those who excuse homosexuality must also be bound to excuse the litany of gross moral perversions which follows?  Or by what means ought a Christian to think that God can forgive and deliver him from his sins of insolence and pride, and not from his homosexuality? 

Thanks be to God, there is both mercy and deliverance from homosexuality along with all other sins.  For the Christian there can be no doubt about it.  If this “rightly attracts derision from people of all political beliefs” then so be it.  We will appeal to a higher court, and await That Day.
 

Restitution Works Good Fruit

Restorative Justice

Restitution and forgiveness can work reconciliation and healing in a way that nothing else can.  Such things, however, do not go down well in the Gentile world which is often riven with enmity, anger, bitterness, and a relentless drive for vengeance.  But God has told us that He has reserved vengeance and retribution to Himself.  He has not  delegated that right to man.  “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.'” (Romans 12: 19)

When the judicial system and society generally get this right, when it conforms more closely to biblical truth, the outcomes can be uplifting and genuinely restorative.  An example of such appeared lately in New Zealand newspapers. 

A man was towing an overloaded trailer.  It jackknifed and killed a motorcyclist.  The online newspaper, Stuff reports:

A grieving nurse moved a courtroom to tears as she delivered a powerful statement of the power of forgiveness to transform hate into healing.  Hera Edwards’ partner of 10 years and the father of her three girls, Ricki Cobb, died when he was hit by a jackknifing trailer towed by Donald Stewart Wills, 64, near Greytown, on November 5, 2011.

Yesterday’s sentencing hearing in the Masterton District Court followed a restorative justice process.  The victim impact statement that Ms Edwards read out in court yesterday was hailed by Judge Bill Hastings for “rising above the aura of hatred” to produce instead the “healing power of forgiveness”.

Donald Wills had been through a restorative justice process (see below) and had determined to do what he could to Hera Edwards and her three children, left fatherless by the death of their loved one.

Judge Hastings read out a paragraph of a letter Wills wrote offering reparation for emotional harm totalling $25,000. Of that, $10,000 was to be paid into a trust fund set up for the education and welfare of Mr Cobb’s children, with the rest in cash. Police prosecutor Gary Wilson said outside court that this was “far in excess” of what would normally be ordered by the court in such a case.  Wills, an engineer, of Morrisons Bush, also promised to supply frozen meat and produce to Ms Edwards, 35, and the family on an ongoing basis.

A salutary thing in this case–which the judge highlighted–was the willingness of Hera Edwards to forgive the man who had brought so much pain and damage into her family.  She made a conscious decision that she would not allow the hurt to degenerate into self-destructive bitterness.  She consciously rejected the easy descent into victimhood–for the sake of her children and in honour their dead father.

In her statement yesterday, Ms Edwards thanked Wills and said she would accept his offer “because of the children” – daughters Lexus, 9, Rhion, 6, and Huntah, 4. “We didn’t ask for anything,” she said. “But I accept [the offer] particularly for our youngest child, who has no memories of her daddy.”

She told Wills: “We come from different worlds, you and I,” but she had seen the good in him, and forgave him in the name of her partner: “Ricki was a good man, who had the capacity to forgive.” Outside court, Ms Edwards said the children were too young to understand entirely what had happened, but she hoped they would grow up seeing the outcome as a lesson in not giving in to pain. “It’s not about forgetting any of it, the hurt and pain and what happened. But you can hurt without it turning into hate.”

No doubt the restorative justice system (where the guilty and the victims of crime meet together, often in the context of families, to seek appropriate remedies for hurt, damage, and harm) sees lots of failures.  But when it bears fruit, the results are way beyond what vengeance and retribution can ever achieve. 

Judge Hastings convicted Wills of careless driving causing death, disqualified him from driving for six months and ordered emotional harm and ongoing support reparation according to the terms offered.  Wills and his wife, Jeanette, who have five adult children, said the experience of restorative justice, which in their case was facilitated by Presbyterian Support Service, had been positive.

“The mechanism is there, it’s independent, and it allows people to say what they think and to share. It’s a vehicle to allow the emotions to work their way through the different steps.  “The restorative justice people are there to facilitate and be a neutral vehicle in a safe environment for both parties.”

However, he and his wife said they wished the encounter with Ms Edwards had occurred sooner. “I wanted to do the best for her and her family, earlier rather than later, and somehow it wasn’t easy to do.” He hoped the process could become more flexible. “Every situation is different, and it needs to be flexible and fluid enough so that anyone can figure out [a solution] for themselves.”

Douglas Wilson’s Letter From America

The Cootie Contagion Radius 

Liturgy and Worship – Exhortation
Written by Douglas Wilson
Saturday, 02 March 2013

One of the things we have to learn as Christians is that, when it comes to appearances, we clean up real nice. But we also have to remember that this is also true of whited sepulchers. They clean up real nice also.

When new Christians join us, still reeling and recovering from all the problems they have had, they are presented with the same optical illusion presented to children who grow up among us. That illusion tells you that you “are the only sinner here.” If people knew what my thought life was like, they wouldn’t have anything to do with me. If people knew the state of my heart, they would shun me. If people knew my past, they would stay out of the cootie contagion radius.

But all of us are a piece of work.
Remember that your fellowship with God is not dependent upon whether or not other Christians treat you right. Rather, your fellowship with other Christians is dependent upon whether or not God has received you. And if God has received you, He has done so even though He knows all of your sins in exhaustive and excruciating detail. What could you tell Him about the state of your heart that would surprise Him, and make Him call your salvation deal off?

If God were to mark iniquities, no one in this room could stand. But if the Word says, as it does, that with Him is forgiveness of sins, it follows from this that everyone in this room can stand. It is true we must take our stand in the grace of God, but having done so, we may stand.

Deathbed Confessions

The Dying of Sir Paul Holmes

God tells us that He has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from their evil ways to Him.  For the past months we in New Zealand have been publicly made aware of the imminent death of Sir Paul Holmes, a broadcaster and interview host.  His deteriorating health, his accomplishments, his family relationships–all have been played out in the public eye.  Deliberately.  Sir Paul, is–and always has been–a showman.

That’s all fine.  Today a newspaper published his final thoughts–sort of the modern version of deathbed reflections and confessions of the famous–a well known historical genre.  We read this:

In an emotional interview with TVNZ’s Sunday programme last night, the veteran broadcaster revealed his innermost fears and reflections as his life draws to a close.  He admitted death was a scary prospect, but said he had made peace with all he needed to.  “I’m a bit frightened, but I plan to increase my peace with God,” he said in the interview aired last night.  “I’m worried about what’s over the hill. I don’t know what there is.”

“I plan to increase my peace with God.”  Striking expression.  What does he mean?

We believe in death-bed repentance, confessions and conversions.  It pleases God to call whomever He will, when and where he chooses.  For some it is on the road to Damascus bearing thither a heart filled with bitter anger and murderous intent.  For others it is amidst excruciating pain whilst racked on a Roman cross. 

Throughout his professional, public life Paul Holmes has mocked Christians, sneering at their “narrow mindedness”, mocking their (to him) simplistic credulity, their failure to conform to the dictates of  modern “scientific” reasonableness, and so forth.  If a Christian publicly criticized abortion or homosexuality the audience was treated to Holmes’s wrinkled lip and sneer of cold disdain  poured forth upon the miserable miscreant currently before him. 

To us, as Christians, it’s not personal.  That’s what pagans do.  They hated the Lord Jesus Christ.  His followers they must also hate.  We extend our free forgiveness to Sir Paul and those who follow in his train.  We are content to leave their judgement to the Judge of the heavens and the earth, Who tries the thoughts and intents of every heart.  We Christians have already been judged.  Our judgement has been certain, final, and deadly–and has been already exacted upon the One Name fully and finally.  We are forgiven because He was condemned.

But now Sir Paul tells us he is planning to “increase his peace with God”.  One has the uneasy impression that he is preparing to meet God as if he were preparing for an interview.  Only now the interviewer is about to be God; the interviewee is to be Sir Paul. Finally the tables are turned.  Knowing that he will have to “spit out all the butt ends of his days and ways” he is polishing up his apologia, his arguments, his extenuations–in a word–his case.  One fears he is doing his research through his memories, aligning his evidences.  One fears that he is approaching this with his trademark, cheeky laddishness, ready to try out the odd flippant remark or joke to get a laugh out of Almighty God. 

We hope not.  All Unbelievers, when they contemplate the Judgment to come, operate a version of the “scales” model–believing that all they need do is demonstrate enough moral worth and achievement to outweigh any evil they may have done.  To see the scales tip ever so slightly in their favour.  The Scriptures will have none of it.  God has already declared to us the uselessness of such thinking.  God’s holiness is infinite; it is absolute.  He is not a mere creature with which to bargain.  To fall short, to miss the mark in one thing is to become guilty in all.  James says, “for whoever observes the whole law, but slips in one point, becomes guilty in every respect.”  (James 2:10).  These words are God-breathed; they are literally God’s words. When One is so holy, so pure, exacting, so infinitely intolerant of sin the “scales” model of judgment is an insult, a blasphemy. 

We hope that Sir Paul is seeking God in repentance, not negotiation; in submission, not haggling; trusting in the mercy of Christ, not false balance weights. 

Hell Bound

No Earthly Hope

The case of the Turangi child rapist has ended.  The details are disclosed.  Most will be left in despair wondering what on earth can be done to stop this kind of thing happening again. 

The family life of the rapist, Raurangi Marino has consequently come to light.  It is pretty much as we expected.  Broken home, alcohol and drugs, beatings, (rival) gang affiliations, parental desertion, family violence, and sexual assaults (2) upon the young Marino. 

Canterbury University sociology professor and criminologist Greg Newbold said children who got into this sort of trouble come from the worst families.”You don’t get many happy, stable families who produce kids who do things like this.”

Stuff provides the litany:

Ms Wall, a former Black Power associate, said her son endured regular beatings at home. “I wanted it to stop but I couldn’t because I was a hard-out alcoholic and it was the family versus me.” She described Marino as a “good boy, a little naughty. He was just brought up too quick, too young, he got into drugs and alcohol too early. I take a lot of responsibility of what happened, and for his upbringing.”

The family was angry at her, she said. “They call me a bad mother and [say] I have brought up horrible children. I’m deeply sorry for the little girl’s family, she will go through trauma for the rest of her life.”  Marino’s father, Mark Marino – a Taupo Mongrel Mob member – said he feared for his son’s safety in prison.

The question that is in our face is, Can this family, and particularly Mr Marino jr, be saved?  The short answer is, no.  There is nothing, no power upon earth that can change or reform these lives.  They are lost, and lost forever.

Doubtless the Marinos will get a lot of false counsel.  There will be those who will call them disgusting animals, sub-human, utterly worthy of degradation and the torments of  Hell forever.  They will be right.  But unless they add the rider, “And so are we all” they will be deceiving themselves and the Marinos.  When David lamented, “I am evil, born in sin” in Psalm 51 he was both telling the truth about himself, and yet confessing what is also true for every living human being upon the planet.

There will be those who will seek to encourage Raurangi Marino by telling him that the fault was not his.  Rather, it was his dysfunctional family, his evil parents, his circumstances of life as a child, and the debilitating effects of alcohol and drugs.  They will be right.  But unless they add what the sentencing judge added–that Marino and Marino alone was responsible for his actions–they will be deceiving themselves and Marino.  The Bible gives this burning indictment to all such: nothing–neither circumstances nor people–make us do evil.  It comes from within, from the lusts of our own heart (James 1: 13,14). 

There will be those who would try to ameliorate Marino’s guilt, and his conscience, by deflecting blame to society at large.  If society had provided “decent” jobs for Marino’s parents, more benefits, less institutional racism; if society had not stripped Maori of their mana by stealing their lands and victimising the tangata whenua, then his mother and father would not have resorted to criminal gangs for their mana, and Marino would not have committed his crime.  Such false counsellors who say such things are beneath contempt: they demean and degrade the Marinos most of all, making them less than human, easy tools, benighted slaves.  Their indictment of society instead of the Marinos is self-serving and false and they also deserve the Outer Darkness.   

No, there is no power upon earth that can save Raurangi Marino: he is Hell bound.  Only God Himself can save the Marinos–if it were to please Him.  He will have mercy on whom He will have mercy, and He hardens whom He desires. (Romans 9:18)  But let none be in doubt: the atoning death of our Lord Jesus Christ is sufficient and hard enough to atone for all His people amongst whom are numbered some of the worst moral degenerates ever seen by, or known to mankind.   It would be sufficient for the Marinos.

But such mercy will not come cheap.  Did not our Lord say, “If any man would come after Me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me”  (Luke 9:23)?   If Marino and his family are going to be delivered from Hell it will cost them everything, let none be in any doubt–least of all, them.  

We hope that one day they come to the point where they would count that cost as nothing in comparison to being delivered from Hell and knowing Christ Jesus, their Lord. In the meantime, our confession is, “There, but for the grace of God, go we.” 

>How Marvellous are Thy Works

>The Power of Christ in the Dark Places of the World

It seems that many of today’s prisons are becoming places of Amazing Grace.  We heard Pastor Alistair Begg, of Parkside Church in Cleveland reading some letters to the congregation received as a result of the church’s radio ministry.  Several had come from prisoners.  One wrote:

I have been faithful in serving the Lord these last seven or eight years. I have been incarcerated now for over twenty years. As one brother put it, since I was arrested at 17, I know nothing of life.

I just finished listening to your study on the Father’s discipline, from 1998. I may not know much about life but I can agree with the Psalmist when he writes,

Lord you are my portion and my cup of blessing;
You hold my future.
The boundary lines have fallen for me in pleasant places;
Indeed I have a beautiful inheritance.

This chap, is probably a lifer, and therefore likely to be a murderer. He may spend the rest of his life in prison. The same infinite power of the Holy Spirit which saved the thief on the Cross, causing him to be born again, in the most helpless and hopeless of circumstances, is blowing across the prisons. The wretched of the earth are becoming glorious citizens of the heavenly kingdom.

Similar testimonies and accounts can be heard from within our own prisons, here in New Zealand.

Chuck Colson has written an essay on the power of forgiveness.  In it he describes some of the amazing things he has observed as a result of prisoners becoming Christians.  God is good and glorious indeed. Continue reading